By writer to www.timesleader.com
By Jordan Rau, Kaiser Well being Information and Rachana Pradhan
Because the coronavirus pandemic paralyzed most nonemergency medical practices this spring, the dialysis enterprise, important to the survival of sufferers with kidney illness, rolled forward and in some instances grew.
But when the Trump administration despatched billions in federal aid funds to medical organizations, a minimum of $259 million went to dialysis suppliers, a KHN evaluation of federal data discovered. Of that, kidney care behemoth Fresenius Medical Care accepted greater than half, a minimum of $137 million, regardless of acknowledging it had ample monetary assets, the evaluation confirmed.
The total quantity going to Fresenius and lots of different dialysis suppliers is much increased than what KHN may affirm. The evaluation was restricted to the portion of grants disclosed by the federal authorities. And the evaluation counted solely grants going to organizations whose main goal was offering dialysis. In a securities submitting final month, Fresenius disclosed it acquired a complete of $277 million in aid funds underneath the Coronavirus Assist, Reduction and Financial Safety (CARES) Act.
Funding to large dialysis suppliers would have been better if DaVita, the opposite multinational company that dominates dialysis care within the U.S., had not turned down $240 million in help, saying different medical suppliers wanted it extra. Fresenius and DaVita every personal greater than 2,600 dialysis facilities nationwide.
Headquartered in Germany, Fresenius Medical Care is targeted on sufferers with kidney failure who want blood-purifying dialysis therapy thrice every week to remain alive, billing itself because the world’s largest supplier of dialysis and associated providers, gear and medicines. Fresenius handled about 350,000 folks worldwide and earned final yr about $1.four billion. The corporate introduced second-quarter earnings exceeding $400 million, up greater than a 3rd over final yr, as a result of a 14% working margin.
“From what we all know at this time, the web impression of COVID-19 on our earnings is just not so important,” Helen Giza, Fresenius’ chief monetary officer, advised analysts.
With scores of COVID-19 sufferers growing main kidney injury, the pandemic triggered surprising demand for dialysis therapy. Power kidney illness and kidney failure had been frequent amongst folks hospitalized with COVID-19, accounting for 13% of all such sufferers nationally from January to March, when the extent of the virus’s unfold within the U.S. was simply coming to gentle, in accordance with FAIR Well being, a well being information nonprofit that analyzes insurance coverage payments.
Little Drop-Off in Enterprise
The bailouts to Fresenius and different dialysis operations present one of many bluntest examples but of how the Division of Well being and Human Providers didn’t direct taxpayer-supported bailout funds solely to suppliers in disaster. Large help funds from the $175 billion Supplier Reduction Fund allotted by Congress went to well-financed firms and segments of the well being care trade like dialysis that had been financially steady, or to companies with ample monetary reserves.
As an example, HCA Healthcare, the for-profit hospital chain, posted a $1.1 billion second-quarter revenue that included $590 million in authorities rescue funds. “We’ve seen billions circulation to rich hospital methods and well being care firms that won’t want the cash,” mentioned Kyle Herrig, president of Accountable.US, a authorities watchdog group and frequent critic of the Trump administration. “We should always have designed a program that was more than likely to assist those who truly wanted the assistance.”
Tougher-hit segments of the well being care trade reported the aid funds had been inadequate to cowl all COVID-related prices and losses. Some docs’ places of work and dentists struggled to remain afloat after having to forgo visits and procedures which are the principle a part of their companies. In contrast to the providers hospitals present, famous Ge Bai, affiliate professor of accounting and well being coverage at Johns Hopkins College in Baltimore, dialysis is “rather more immune to the pandemic by way of income.”
Dialysis clinics mentioned their drop-off in enterprise was minimal.
“For essentially the most half, sufferers truly got here,” mentioned Dr. Mihran Naljayan, medical director of Louisiana State College’s peritoneal dialysis program in New Orleans, one of many nation’s earliest COVID-19 sizzling spots. “We didn’t see a lower within the variety of visits.” As an alternative, when the virus quickly unfold within the New Orleans metro space in late March, the variety of inpatient dialysis remedies jumped 47% and steady renal alternative remedy _ dialysis for critically unwell sufferers that’s carried out for a protracted time _ rose by 260%.
HHS defended its strategy for distributing funds, noting that different choices would have taken for much longer to implement. Congress additionally didn’t instruct the division to find out the monetary power of every supplier when allocating the cash.
“HHS is aware of the monetary hardship many services and suppliers are going through. That’s the reason HHS has and can make focused distributions to services and suppliers which were disproportionately impacted by the coronavirus pandemic,” the division mentioned in a press release.
Protecting Sudden Bills
In explaining their want for federal cash, dialysis clinics giant and small mentioned they confronted surprising prices to guard sufferers from COVID-19. They famous that defraying these prices was an express purpose Congress set in creating the bailout fund and that their allotments didn’t cowl these bills.
Brad Puffer, a spokesperson for Fresenius Medical Care North America, which recorded about $41 billion in gross sales final yr, mentioned the cash helped dialysis facilities equip staff with protecting gear equivalent to robes, segregate COVID-positive sufferers, give emergency pay and baby care stipends for staff, cowl the prices of COVID testing and enact a telehealth system to conduct digital visits.
“We imagine our early and aggressive actions, and the vigilance with which our workers have applied these actions, have efficiently lowered the dangers to our sufferers and workers,” Puffer mentioned in an electronic mail.
Congress offered the cash however largely left to federal well being officers the specifics on how these grants, which don’t need to be repaid, must be distributed. In its haste to prop up suppliers, and after lobbying by hospitals and different sectors to rapidly get cash out the door, HHS meted out the primary $50 billion based mostly on previous Medicare funds and total affected person income. Subsequent funding was steered to COVID-19 sizzling spots, nursing houses, suppliers in rural areas and safety-net establishments that look after increased numbers of the uninsured and different weak teams.
The cash is on the market to hospitals, doctor practices, dialysis clinics and different medical entities no matter monetary power; suppliers had solely to agree the cash can be used both to exchange revenue misplaced due to the pandemic or to cowl COVID-related bills that weren’t reimbursed by way of different means.
In April, DaVita, a Fortune 500 firm based mostly in Denver that noticed $11 billion in income and $1 billion in web revenue final yr, indicated it might hold the $240 million the federal government despatched. However a month later, CEO Javier Rodriguez advised analysts DaVita determined to return the funds despite the fact that the corporate had incurred additional prices due to the pandemic.
“From our perspective, they had been a security web,” he mentioned. “And so they had been for use for those who wanted that cash, as a result of the financial injury was so extreme, that they couldn’t hold their doorways open.”
In July, DaVita reported a 14% working margin, a key measure of its enterprise, for the second quarter. That was down from 16% from the identical time final yr. The corporate’s web revenue was $202 million.
Dan Mendelson, founding father of the well being consulting agency Avalere and a personal fairness investor, mentioned the transfer by DaVita most likely helps its picture. “They’re very attuned to how issues look,” Mendelson mentioned. “After I noticed they had been turning it down, I used to be not stunned.”
A Regular Demand
The dialysis trade tailored its care after the pandemic struck. That included segregating sufferers suspected of getting or identified with COVID-19 from uninfected folks, limiting employees interplay with sufferers, hiring further personnel and bulking up on protecting gear.
However whereas the pandemic pressured different varieties of suppliers to shut quickly or considerably restrict procedures, there was little impression on dialysis providers.
LogistiCare Options, which has contracts with a number of state Medicaid applications to offer nonemergency medical transportation to enrollees, noticed a gentle demand from dialysis sufferers, whereas requires different medical and social providers waned due to COVID-induced shutdowns, senior adviser Albert Cortina mentioned. Dialysis sufferers, who accounted for roughly a fifth of the corporate’s quantity earlier than the pandemic, shot as much as account for greater than 40%.
“It was thought of a real important service,” Cortina mentioned.
Some unbiased dialysis facilities mentioned the HHS aid funds had been essential despite the fact that they maintained regular affected person masses. Northwest Kidney Facilities, a nonprofit that runs 19 dialysis facilities primarily in Seattle, acquired $2.6 million. Dr. Suzanne Watnick, the chief medical officer, mentioned that won’t cowl the entire substantial bills the middle incurred in growing safety for sufferers and staff.
“It’s vital to acknowledge that what we needed to do and arise was like being in a hospital,” she mentioned.
Watnick didn’t begrudge the massive dialysis firms that accepted the bailout cash. “They do have 100 instances the variety of sufferers; that appears an affordable technique to allocate,” she mentioned. “What do you say? ‘You might have extra of a revenue margin, however you get much less cash’?”
(Kaiser Well being Information (KHN) is a nationwide well being coverage information service. It’s an editorially unbiased program of the Henry J. Kaiser Household Basis.)
(c)2020 Kaiser Well being Information
Go to Kaiser Well being Information at
Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.
PHOTO (for assist with photographs, contact 312-222-4194):
— to www.timesleader.com