By writer to www.dovepress.com
Introduction
Bone and mineral illness (BMD) are the first reason behind morbidity in sufferers with kidney transplantation (KT), resulting in an elevated danger of fractures and consequently rising the price of well being care, hospitalization, and mortality.1 Recipients of KT are particularly weak to bone harm contemplating prior bone-related points (eg, bone high quality or density and mineral metabolism), immunosuppression routine, and the change within the renal bone metabolism.2
A number of current research indicated that KT recipients have an above-average fracture charge, as they’ve fewer osteopenia.3 In KT, the speed of fractures is greater within the first three years submit KT by 34%; after that the overall fracture danger is much less and is comparable with dialysis sufferers.4 Regardless of enhancing mineral metabolism, the fracture danger stays vital even ten years from KT.4 The fractures are generally noticed within the hip and foot.5 In contrast with the overall inhabitants, KT recipients that suffer from fractures have an elevated danger of mortality by 60%.6 A current publication that addressed the bone-vascular axis speculation in kidney transplant recipients and fifty 4 % developed BMD following transplantation, this can be a current speculation that gives rationalization of the correlation between transplantation and BMD.7
Though the information from america Renal Knowledge System (USRDS) indicated that the speed for hip fracture has declined in transplanted sufferers by 45% through the years on account of much less corticosteroids publicity along with the improved administration of different elements.4 Nonetheless, the danger remains to be thought of elevated relative to common inhabitants. As well as, the findings from an evaluation in the UK with 21,769 renal transplant recipients confirmed that hip fractures are independently related to a threefold elevated danger of mortality.8
The underlying mechanism of BMD initially begins in sufferers with continual kidney illness (CKD) due to abnormalities in calcium, vitamin D, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and fibroblast progress issue 23.1 Moreover, many elements concurrently elevate the danger of BMD after KT, together with the pre-existing CKD-related renal osteodystrophy and to different elements contributing to bone loss. The BMD traits within the post-transplant interval embody abnormalities similar to hypophosphatemia, hypercalcemia, and hyperparathyroidism.9 The vary of bone loss submit KT varies between renal osteodystrophy, osteoporosis, bone fractures, and osteonecrosis.1
This examine goals to report on the expertise of two medical facilities in Saudi Arabia in an effort to consider the attainable danger elements related to bone and mineral illness throughout the first two years’ post-renal transplantation.
Main Goal
The first goal of this examine is to guage the attainable danger elements related to bone and mineral illness post-renal transplantation.
Secondary Targets
Secondary targets to be investigated on this examine are to estimate the incidence of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fractures in such sufferers.
Operational Definitions
Osteopenia = BMD between 1 SD and a couple of.5 SD beneath the younger grownup imply (typically seen as T-score between –1 and –2.5).
Osteoporosis = BMD a minimum of 2.5 SD beneath the younger grownup imply (typically seen as T-score of lower than –2.5).
FRAX: stands for fracture danger evaluation software, a software that predict the danger of fracture in sufferers with osteoporosis throughout the subsequent ten years.
Supplies and Strategies
Examine Design and Inhabitants
We carried out a retrospective observational examine in two kidney transplant facilities in Saudi Arabia, King Abdul-Aziz Medical Metropolis, Riyadh, and King Abdullah Medical Metropolis, Makkah. Sufferers aged 18 years or older admitted for kidney transplantation in both of those two facilities have been eligible to take part. Exclusion standards included sufferers with a number of organ transplantation and pediatric sufferers. The examine protocol concerning affected person information processing and storage for medical analysis involving human topics was accepted by the Institutional Evaluation Board from each collaborating facilities and carried out in accordance with declarations of Helsinki and Istanbul. Eligible kidney transplant sufferers have been included. Because the examine is retrospective chart assessment, the affected person consents had been waived however the affected person information confidentiality and privateness have been maintained. Baseline related laboratory values have been recorded from the medical file from the admission and through the next 24-months post-transplantation.
The examine is retrospective analysis examine, and the digital medical information have been reviewed as deemed mandatory. There was data as proven in Table 1 that talked about the kind of the transplanted organ (dwelling vs deceased). In response to Saudi Ministry of Well being, dwelling organ donation is proscribed strictly to first diploma family members and this problem is extremely regulated. The authors affirm that each one kidneys have been donated voluntarily with written knowledgeable consent, and that this was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Istanbul.
 |
Desk 1 Baseline Traits of Sufferers and the Motive for Transplantation (n = 197) |
Statistical Evaluation
Knowledge evaluation was carried out utilizing IBM Statistical Package deal for the Social Sciences, SPSS 23rd model (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Frequency and percentages have been used to show categorical variables along with the imply and normal deviation for steady variables. Chi-square assessments have been used to check for the presence of affiliation between categorical variables. An impartial t-test was additionally utilized to check for an affiliation. The extent of significance was set at 0.05.
Outcomes
A complete of 197 sufferers have been included within the examine. Table 1 exhibits the baseline traits of the sufferers and the rationale for transplantation. 100 and 6 (53.8%) contributors have been males, and 91 (46.2%) have been females. Solely 15 (7.6%) of the sufferers have been people who smoke. The imply age of the contributors was 45.85 + 13.96. The imply BMI of contributors was 28.37 + 6.13. As for the prognosis (cause for the transplant), the sufferers have been categorized as follows: 103 (52.3%) had an unknown origin, 46 (23.4%) had diabetic nephropathy, 23 (11.7%) had hypertension, 8 (4.1%) had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, 4 (2%) had lupus nephritis, 4 (2%) had polycystic kidney illness, 3 (1.5%) had IgA nephropathy, 2 (1%) had Alport syndrome, 2 (1%) had glomerulonephritis, and a couple of (1%) had reflux nephropathy. Osteoporosis danger in addition to hip fracture danger earlier than transplantation are proven in Table 1. The prior transplantation FRAX rating for evaluation of great osteoporotic danger confirmed that 116 (58.9%) had low danger, 8 (4.1%) had intermediate danger, and 5 (2.5%) had a excessive danger, whereas 68 (34.5%) rating was not relevant for them. The FRAX rating for hip fracture danger previous to transplantation was indicated that 119 (60.4%) had low danger and 10 (5.1%) had excessive danger.
The medical historical past of sufferers previous to transplantation revealed that forty-four (22.3%) have been post-menopause females, 5 (2.5%) had osteoarthritis, 29 (14.7%) had osteopenia, 5 (2.5%) had osteoporosis, and seven (3.6%) had a historical past of fracture.
The post-transplantation medical historical past of the sufferers demonstrated that 100 forty-nine (75.6%) had hypertension, 107 (54.3%) had diabetes, 48 (24.4%) had osteopenia, 39 (19.8%) had osteoporosis, 13 (6.6%) had a historical past of fracture, and 24 (12.2%) had a historical past of cerebrovascular illness. As well as, the graft sort for the sufferers included on this examine have been 100 forty-one (71.6%) who had a graft from a dwelling donor, and 56 (28.4%) had a cadaveric donation.
Bone Mineral Density testing and interpretation for sufferers earlier than and after transplantation. These findings are proven in Table 2. Solely 46 (23.4%) had bone mineral density (BMD) examined previous to transplantation. Amongst these 4 (2%) had osteoporosis, 15 (7.6%) had osteopenia, and 27 (13.7%) had regular BMD. As for post-transplantation imaging, solely 53 (26.9%) had BMD examined. Amongst these 22 (11.2%) had osteoporosis, 21 (10.7%) had osteopenia, and 10 (5.1%) had regular BMD.
 |
Desk 2 Bone Mineral Density Findings Prior and Publish-Transplantation (n = 197) |
The medical historical past of sufferers previous to transplantation revealed that forty-four (22.3%) have been post-menopause females, 5 (2.5%) had osteoarthritis, 29 (14.7%) had osteopenia, 5 (2.5%) had osteoporosis, and seven (3.6%) had a historical past of fracture. Whereas post-transplantation medical historical past of the sufferers revealed that 100 forty-nine (75.6%) had hypertension, 107 (54.3%) had diabetes, 48 (24.4%) had osteopenia, 39 (19.8%) had osteoporosis, 13 (6.6%) had a historical past of fracture, and 24 (12.2%) had a historical past of cerebrovascular illness.
Table 3 shows the biochemical information prior and post-transplantation. For the previous to transplantation biochemical information, the imply complete calcium was 2.01 + 0.40 mmol/l, the imply free calcium was 2.19 + 0.36 mmol/l, the imply parathyroid hormone (PTH) was 50.01 + 38.54 pg/mL, and the imply phosphate (PO4) was 1.61 + 0.49 mmol/l. The imply vitamin D stage previous to transplantation was 28.77 + 16.10 ng/mL. As for the vitamin D stage previous to transplantation, 44 (22.3%) had vitamin D deficiency, 43 (21.8%) had insufficiency, 53 (26.9%) had enough vitamin D stage, and 57 (28.9%) didn’t endure vitamin D investigation previous to transplantation. As for the post-transplantation biochemical information, the imply complete calcium was 2.07 + 0.26 mmol/l, the imply PTH was 24.60 + 21.31 pg/mL, the imply PO4 was 1.47 + 2.01 mmol/l, and the imply vitamin D stage was 32.40 + 22.92. As for the vitamin D stage post-transplantation, 46 (23.4%) had vitamin D deficiency, 37 (18.8%) had insufficiency, 112 (56.9%) had enough vitamin D stage, and a couple of (1%) didn’t endure vitamin D investigation post-transplantation.
 |
Desk 3 Comparability of Imply Between Biochemical Markers Earlier than and After Transplantation |
The remedy historical past of contributors previous to and post-transplantation revealed that the drugs previous to transplantation have been as follows: 87 (44.2%) have been taking calcium carbonate, 80 (40.6%) have been taking vitamin D, 12 (6.1%) have been taking prednisolone, 12 (6.1%) have been taking anti-epileptic, 7 (3.6%) have been taking anti-coagulant warfarin, and 85 (43.1%) have been taking PPI. Concerning the anti-epileptic taken by the sufferers, 1 (0.5%) was taking levetiracetam, 2 (1%) have been taking carbamazepine, 5 (2.5%) have been taking pregabalin, 3 (1.5%) have been taking phenytoin, and 1 (0.5%) was taking valproic acid. As for the induction remedy, 129 (66.5%) took antithyroglobulin (ATG), and 68 (34.5%) took basiliximab. As for the drugs taken post-transplantation, 163 (82.7%) have been taking steroids, 115 (58.4%) have been taking vitamin D, 8 (4.1%) have been taking bisphosphonate, 97 (49.2%) have been taking calcium, 165 (83.8%) have been taking MMF, 8 (4.1%) have been taking anti-epileptic, 30 (15.2%) have been taking anti-coagulant, 165 (83.8%) have been taking PPI, and 22 (11.2%) have been taking furosemide. Concerning the anti-epileptic taken by the sufferers, 1 (0.5%) was taking levetiracetam, 4 (2%) have been taking pregabalin, 2 (1%) have been taking phenytoin, and 1 (0.5%) was taking valproic acid. The anticoagulants utilized by the sufferers have been as follows: 11 (5.6%) have been taking warfarin, 15 (7.6%) have been taking heparin, and 4 (2%) have been taking apixaban.
Figure 1 exhibits the incidence of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fracture earlier than and two years after transplantation. There was a statistically vital distinction in osteoporosis incidence earlier than and after transplantation (2.5% vs 19.8%). Equally, there was a statistically vital distinction in osteopenia incidence earlier than and after (14.7% vs 24.4%). Then again, there was no statistically vital distinction in fracture incidence earlier than and after transplantation (3.6% vs 6.6%).
 |
Determine 1 Distribution of osteoporosis, osteopenia and fracture of earlier than and after transplantation. |
Table 4 illustrates the elements related to post-transplantation osteoporosis. A major affiliation was noticed between the historical past of osteoporosis previous to transplantation and creating osteoporosis post-transplantation (p-value = 0.022). A major affiliation was additionally noticed between the variety of rejections and having osteoporosis post-transplantation (p-value = 0.047). A major correlation was additionally noticed between having post-transplantation osteoporosis and the degrees of complete calcium (p-value = 0.023), free calcium (p-value = 0.011) and PTH (p-value = 0.006). Greater technique of complete calcium and free calcium have been seen in these with post-transplantation osteoporosis in comparison with those that didn’t have osteoporosis post-transplantation, whereas decrease imply of PTH was noticed in these with osteoporosis post-transplantation in comparison with these with out it. All different danger elements weren’t of statistically vital distinction.
 |
Desk 4 Elements Related to Publish-Transplantation Osteoporosis |
Table 5 demonstrates the elements related to post-transplantation osteopenia. A major affiliation was noticed between the historical past of osteoporosis previous to transplantation and having osteopenia post-transplantation (p-value = 0.003). A major affiliation was additionally noticed between the historical past of osteopenia previous to transplantation and having osteopenia post-transplantation (p-value < 0.001). A major affiliation was noticed between the historical past of osteoarthritis previous to transplantation and having osteopenia post-transplantation (p-value < 0.001). A major affiliation was additionally seen between sort of graft and having osteopenia post-transplantation (p-value = 0.002). A major affiliation was additionally seen between utilizing anti-coagulation previous to transplantation and having osteopenia post-transplantation (p-value = 0.003). A major correlation was additionally noticed between having post-transplantation osteopenia and complete calcium (p-value = 0.029) and free calcium (p-value = 0.026), phosphate (p-value = 0.007). Greater technique of complete calcium and free calcium have been seen in these with post-transplantation osteopenia than those that didn’t have osteopenia post-transplantation, whereas a decrease imply of phosphate was noticed in these with osteopenia post-transplantation in comparison with these with out it. All different danger elements weren’t of statistically vital distinction.
 |
Desk 5 Elements Related to Publish-Transplantation Osteopenia |
Table 6 demonstrates the elements related to post-transplantation fracture. A major affiliation was noticed between the historical past of osteopenia previous to transplantation and having fractures post-transplantation (p-value < 0.001). A major affiliation was additionally noticed between sort of graft and having fractures post-transplantation (p-value = 0.001). The next charge of post-transplantation fracture was present in these with cadaveric graft in comparison with those that had a graft from dwelling donor. A major correlation was additionally noticed between having post-transplantation osteopenia and complete calcium (p-value = 0.039). A decrease imply of complete calcium was present in these with post-transplantation fracture in comparison with those that didn’t have fracture post-transplantation. A rise within the fracture incidence was noticed post-transplantation in 7 sufferers (3.6%) in comparison with 13 sufferers (6.6%). Nonetheless, this remark is marked as insignificant with McNamar’s check (p = 0.263). All different danger elements weren’t of statistically vital distinction.
 |
Desk 6 Elements Related to Publish-Transplantation Fracture |
Dialogue
This examine centered on assessing attainable danger elements resulting in bone and mineral ailments and their incidence throughout the first two years submit kidney transplantation in two tertiary facilities in Saudi Arabia. Our retrospective observational examine confirmed a major affiliation between a number of danger elements with osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fractures submit kidney transplantation. The danger elements correlated considerably with osteoporosis included historical past of osteoporosis previous to kidney transplantation, the variety of graft rejections, and a better stage of complete and free calcium with a low PTH stage. Furthermore, the elements related to osteopenia danger have been prior historical past to transplantation of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteoarthritis, along with cadaveric graft sort, use of anticoagulation previous to transplantation, greater imply complete and free calcium, and decrease phosphate stage. Moreover, the danger elements related to post-transplantation fractures have been prior historical past to transplantation of osteopenia, cadaveric graft, and decrease complete calcium previous to transplantation. As for the incidence of bone and mineral illness submit kidney transplantation, our examine confirmed that solely 53 sufferers (26.9%) had BMD examined submit kidney transplantation, of whom 22 (11.2%) had osteoporosis, 21 (10.7%) had osteopenia, and 10 (5.1%) had regular BMD.9
Nonetheless, when evaluating our outcomes to earlier research, Vangala et al described elements affecting osteoporosis danger and selling bone loss after transplantation, together with residual BMD, glucocorticoids, hypomagnesemia, and hypogonadism.10 As well as, transplant sufferers are particularly in danger due to the immunosuppression routine, which may enhance the danger of osteoporosis via completely different mechanisms; mostly, glucocorticoids can lower calcium absorption within the gut and result in elevated calcium loss. They’re additionally recognized to exert their impact by altering the Receptor Activator of Nuclear Issue-κB Ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin, thus lowering osteoblastogenesis and rising osteoclast manufacturing.10,11 Different brokers like tacrolimus and sirolimus, have been each could cause apoptosis to osteoblasts.12 Then again, amongst immunosuppressive brokers, mycophenolate appears to have a impartial impact concerning BMD, though proof is missing.13 One other examine in Iraq, included 70 kidney transplant sufferers adopted for six months reported that osteoporosis was seen in 52.9% of sufferers, and the danger elements related to osteoporosis submit kidney transplantation included low physique mass index, diabetes mellitus, second kidney transplantation, pre-transplant steroid remedy, and Vitamin D deficiency.14 A scientific assessment assessing fracture danger submit kidney transplantation confirmed a major affiliation with older age (elevated danger of fractures by 14%), feminine gender (42% elevated danger of fractures), diabetes mellitus as a possible danger issue, dialysis pre-transplant (74% danger enhance if fractures), prior fractures, and deceased donor.15,16
In our examine, the incidence of BMD submit kidney transplantation was akin to that described in earlier research. Nonetheless, there have been some variations concerning the danger elements related to BMD submit kidney transplantation. In our examine, the reported elements have been divided into osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fractures danger. The primary danger issue was having a earlier presence of BMD previous to kidney transplantation. Secondly, a number of graft rejections will be linked to the intensification of immunosuppressive brokers throughout the rejection section, resulting in worsening BMD submit kidney transplantation. Thirdly, greater calcium ranges within the blood point out poor absorption of calcium into bones, thus resulting in BMD, whereas having low PTH, which will be anticipated in sufferers submit kidney transplantation, particularly throughout the first six months due to a lowered parathyroid useful gland mass.17 Fourthly, the cadaveric graft sort was considerably related to osteopenia and fractures danger. This discovering is per two earlier research that in contrast the impact of cadaveric graft sort to dwelling donor graft, the place each discovered a considerably elevated fracture danger with the cadaveric graft.18,19 Nikkle et al discovered a 36% elevated danger of fractures in cadaveric graft (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.24–1.49).19 Lastly, using anticoagulation previous to transplantation has been linked to an elevated danger of osteopenia, which may very well be defined by the impact anticoagulants have on bone metabolism.20
To our information, this examine is the primary to explain each the incidence and danger elements of BMD submit kidney transplantation in Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the evaluation included osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fracture danger in two tertiary hospitals in central and western areas in Saudi Arabia. Nonetheless, this examine has some limitations, together with the retrospective, observational examine design, and BMD was not examined for many of the sufferers included within the examine. Along with the small variety of included sufferers, which can have affected the generalizability of the examine outcomes.
Conclusion
The incidence of BMD submit kidney transplantation will be anticipated via a number of danger elements that have been considerably related to rising the danger of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fracture danger submit kidney transplantation. In response to our discovering that the elements related to BMD have been the historical past of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and osteoarthritis, variety of rejections, ranges of complete calcium, free calcium, phosphate and PTH, sort of graft, and anti-coagulation use.
Additional research with a bigger pattern dimension are warranted to explain methods to regulate BMD- related danger elements and the most effective remedy choices for BMD submit kidney transplantation.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of curiosity on this work.
References
1. Bouquegneau A, Salam S, Delanaye P, Eastell R, Khwaja A. Bone illness after kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(7):1282–1296. doi:10.2215/CJN.11371015
2. Schreiber PW, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Boggian Ok, et al. Bone metabolism dynamics within the early post-transplant interval following kidney and liver transplantation. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191167. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191167
3. Lip A, Warias A, Shamseddin MK, Thomson B, Wijeratne DT. Impact of bisphosphonates on bone well being in grownup renal transplant sufferers: past the primary 12 months posttransplant—a scientific assessment and meta-analysis. Cana j Kidney Well being Dis. 2019;6:2054358119858014. doi:10.1177/2054358119858014
4. Sukumaran Nair S, Lenihan CR, Montez-Rath ME, Lowenberg DW, Chertow GM, Winkelmayer WC. Temporal developments within the incidence, remedy and outcomes of hip fracture after first kidney transplantation in america. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:943–951. doi:10.1111/ajt.12652
5. Ball AM, Gillen DL, Sherrard D, et al. Threat of hip fracture amongst dialysis and renal transplant recipients. JAMA. 2002;288:3014–3018. doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.3014
6. Naylor KL, Li AH, Lam NN, Hodsman AB, Jamal SA, Garg AX. Fracture danger in kidney transplant recipients: a scientific assessment. Transplantation. 2013;95:1461–1470. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e31828eead8
7. Sotomayor CG, Benjamens S, Gomes-Neto AW, et al. Bone mineral density and aortic calcification: proof for a bone-vascular axis after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2021;105(1):231–239. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000003226
8. Ferro CJ, Arnold J, Bagnall D, Ray D, Sharif A. Fracture danger and mortality post-kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2015;29:1004–1012. doi:10.1111/ctr.12621
9. Vangala C, Pan J, Cotton RT, Ramanathan V. (2018) Mineral and Bone Problems After Kidney Transplantation. Entrance Med. 2018;5:211. doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00211
10. O’Brien CA, Jia D, Plotkin LI, et al. Glucocorticoids act instantly on osteoblasts and osteocytes to induce their apoptosis and cut back bone formation and energy. Endocrinology. 2004;145:1835–1841. doi:10.1210/en.2003-0990
11. Kim HJ, Zhao H, Kitaura H, et al. Glucocorticoids suppress bone formation by way of the osteoclast. J Clin Make investments. 2006;116:2152–2160. doi:10.1172/JCI28084
12. Martin-Fernandez M, Rubert M, Montero M, de la Piedra C. Results of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and rapamycin on osteoblasts. Transplant Proceed. 2017;49:2219–2224. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.07.005
13. Sadideen H, Covic A, Goldsmith D. Mineral and bone dysfunction after renal transplantation: a assessment. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40:171–184. doi:10.1007/s11255-007-9310-y
14. Hameed EO, Sinjari HY. Prevalence and danger elements of osteoporosis in kidney transplant recipients: dual-Vitality x-ray absorptiometry scan examine. Med J Babylon. 2018;15:267–270. doi:10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_91_18
15. Abbott KC, Oglesby RJ, Hypolite IO, et al. Hospitalizations for fractures after renal transplantation in america. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11:450. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00226-5
16. Naylor KL, Li AH, Lam NN, Hodsman AB, Jamal SA, Garg AX. Fracture danger in kidney transplant recipients: a scientific assessment. Transplantation. 2013;95(12):1461–1470.
17. Kalantar-Zadeh Ok, Molnar MZ, Kovesdy CP, Mucsi I, Bunnapradist S. Administration of mineral and bone dysfunction after kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012;21(4):389–403. doi:10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283546ee0
18. Nikkel LE, Hollenbeak CS, Fox EJ, et al. Threat of fractures after renal transplantation in america. Transplantation. 2009;87:1846. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a6bbda
19. Nikkel LE, Mohan S, Zhang A, et al. Diminished fracture danger with early corticosteroid withdrawal after kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:649. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03872.x
20. Signorelli SS, Scuto S, Marino E, Giusti M, Xourafa A, Gaudio A. Anticoagulants and Osteoporosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(21):5275. doi:10.3390/ijms20215275
— to www.dovepress.com
