By creator to www.metroweekly.com
Blood donation — Photograph: New Africa
“I bear in mind the primary time I went to donate blood as an grownup, within the late ’80s,” says Scott Weiner. “The questionnaire mentioned in the event you’d had intercourse with a person since 1977, you couldn’t donate. I bear in mind the sensation within the pit of my abdomen, that I used to be completely banned from donating blood for the remainder of my life. It was actually demoralizing, and made me really feel like a second-class citizen.”
Weiner got here of age as a homosexual man in 1987, when he was 17, on the peak of the AIDS epidemic. “There was no efficient therapy for HIV,” he says. “Individuals had been dying in obscene numbers. It was a really scary time to come back to grips that I used to be homosexual.”
Now, nearly 33 years later, the Democratic state senator from California who represents San Francisco, has seen the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration transfer from completely banning all males who’ve intercourse with males to, in 2015, permitting homosexual and bisexual males to donate 12 months after their final sexual encounter. Final week, the FDA once more revised its coverage on blood donations, lowering the deferral interval to 3 months.
The coverage change comes as well being consultants, together with the U.S. Surgeon Common Jerome Adams, warned that social distancing efforts to “flatten the curve” of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic had been drastically lowering the availability of accessible blood, and inspired youthful, more healthy People to donate. In asserting the change, the FDA particularly cited the necessity for extra blood donations amid the COVID-19 disaster, and mentioned the modifications “are anticipated to stay in place after the COVID-19 public well being emergency ends.”
For Wiener, the decrease deferral interval for homosexual and bisexual males — and people people who’ve intercourse with them, together with transgender folks and cisgender ladies — could be a step in the precise course, nevertheless it’s nonetheless not sufficient.
“Sure, one yr of celibacy is much less horrible than a lifetime ban, and three months of celibacy is much less horrible than a yr, nevertheless it’s all horrible,” he says. “And none of it’s based mostly in science, none of it’s rational, and it’s all utterly discriminatory.
“We all know that each blood donation is examined for HIV and the RNA take a look at for HIV has a mere 10-to-14-day window. So except that individual seroconverted inside a week-and-a-half to 2 weeks earlier than giving, the take a look at will display screen that blood out. On condition that, why would you require even three months of celibacy when the resting window is 10 to 14 days?
“There’s no conceivable, rational clarification for that rule. It’s merely based mostly on outdated stereotypes, and admittedly, animus in the direction of homosexual and bi males, assuming we’re all illness vectors, we’re all filthy, that homosexual intercourse is soiled,” Wiener says. “It’s simply tragic that the FDA, which is supposedly a scientific group, is ignoring the science on blood donation. And but you would be a sexually energetic, non-monogamous straight individual, and none of this is able to apply to you.”
Wiener is in favor of transferring to behavioral-based screening for all donors.
“The FDA ought to both undertake behavioral screening, or an across-the-board celibacy interval for everybody in the event that they imagine that’s mandatory,” he says. “As a result of there are lots of homosexual males who aren’t having that a lot intercourse, and straight people who find themselves having intercourse on a regular basis.”
Wiener admits that adopting an across-the-board celibacy interval is unlikely as a result of it may severely impair the obtainable blood provide, however testing and self-screening — which he believes most potential donors are accountable sufficient to do — is sufficient to shield the blood provide from any bloodborne illnesses like HIV or hepatitis.
On Tuesday, Wiener hosted a blood drive at San Francisco’s Zellerbach Rehearsal Corridor, which he referred to as the #GiveforaGay blood drive, to carry consideration to the FDA’s restrictions even with the decrease deferral interval being adopted.
“As quickly as I noticed that the decision for social distancing was affecting blood donations, I knew we needed to extend the availability of blood, whereas additionally reminding folks {that a} section of the inhabitants is irrationally prohibited from giving,” says Wiener. “So I mentioned ‘Let’s work with the Purple Cross, maintain a blood drive, and name consideration to this difficulty.’”
Like Wiener, many LGBTQ activists see the FDA’s current announcement as optimistic progress, however really feel it doesn’t go far sufficient in lowering the stigma round homosexual and bisexual males — in addition to different LGBTQ people who want to donate.
“Beneath the brand new tips, an individual who has had unprotected intercourse solely days earlier than can nonetheless donate blood, whereas a homosexual or bisexual man who has had intercourse with one other man inside three months of the date of donation — regardless of utilizing condoms and taking HIV prevention drugs like PREP — can’t,” Alphonso David, the president of the Human Rights Marketing campaign, mentioned in a press name following the announcement. “This distinction is unfair, and based mostly in bias.
“Deferral needs to be based mostly on info that’s inside the private information and management of the possible donor,” he added, “and never on the sexual orientation or gender identification of the donor, or the sexual orientation, gender identification, or actions of 1’s sexual companions, or on perceived monogamy.”
Tammy Baldwin — Photograph: Todd Franson
U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), who additionally participated within the name, welcomed the brand new deferral interval as a “milestone” within the struggle for equality with regards to blood donation insurance policies, whereas saying it nonetheless falls quick.
“I take into consideration the truth that we wish our insurance policies on this public well being disaster to learn by the most effective scientific experience, the most effective public well being info,” she mentioned. “Likewise, we should always demand that in regards to the insurance policies that govern our blood provide in america.
“Ending discriminatory blood donation insurance policies is one thing I’ve been engaged in for a few years and be sure that all wholesome people are capable of donate,” famous Baldwin. “It shouldn’t have taken a pandemic and the ensuing blood scarcity to make progress on this difficulty.”
U.S Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), who’s homosexual, expressed related sentiments in a press release.
“Homosexual and bisexual males ought to be capable of donate blood similar to each different American,” Cicilline mentioned. “The change introduced this week is a step ahead, however the restrictions in place are nonetheless discriminatory. I’m going to proceed combating till all LGBTQ People are equal within the eyes of the regulation.”
Mathew Lasky, director of communications for the LGBTQ media advocacy group GLAAD, says even with the decrease deferral interval that there are going to be giant numbers of homosexual and bisexual males who will likely be unable to donate, even when they’re concerned in a dedicated, monagamous relationship.
“The brand new deferral interval is extra according to science than the earlier coverage, however you could have some scientists pushing [the idea] that there is no such thing as a want for time-based deferral durations in any respect, and that they don’t assist in guaranteeing blood security,” he says.
If america had been to eradicate time-based deferrals and transfer to a behavioral-based screening of potential blood donors, as have nations like Italy, Lasky says, the way in which it might work is that every one potential donors would fill out a questionnaire asking about their sexual practices and well being historical past. Based mostly on these responses, whoever was administering the survey would decide who was eligible to donate. Blood collected from donors would then be screened for HIV and different sexually transmitted infections, as it’s presently.
Jason Cianciotto, the senior managing director of the New York-based Homosexual Males’s Well being Disaster, cites GMHC’s decade-long work of combating towards what, on the time, was a lifetime ban for homosexual and bisexual blood donors. He says the group favors transferring to a screening coverage that might defer anybody susceptible to having contracted HIV within the 10-to-14-day window earlier than the virus is detectable of their blood, no matter their sexual orientation.
“I believe our work started in earnest in 2010 when GMHC revealed and launched a report that made the case, based mostly on the knowledge on the time, {that a} lifetime deferral for all homosexual and bisexual males, merely due to their sexual orientation, was not warranted, was not rooted in the most effective obtainable science, and, in reality, was dangerous as a result of it promoted the stereotype that HIV is a homosexual illness,” Cianciotto says.
Blood drop — Photograph: Greg Courville
“The implications of that stereotype extends far past simply the hurt executed in stopping numerous folks from with the ability to donate blood and blood merchandise,” he provides. “It carries ahead probably the most dangerous social determinants of the epidemic, by selling the thought, particularly to LGBTQ youth, that due to their sexual orientation, they’re diseased and are going to get some type of lethal sickness.”
GMHC was amongst a variety of LGBTQ teams who spoke out towards the FDA’s 12-month deferral interval when it was launched in 2015, criticizing it for being “akin to a lifetime ban” as a result of it was not practical to anticipate folks to stay abstinent for a complete yr in order that they might be capable of donate blood.
“Inside the context of COVID-19, the deferral interval takes on a deeper and extra dangerous significance,” notes Cianciotto. “Not solely do the consequences of COVID-19 ravage the lungs so that somebody is in want of blood, however bodily and social distancing have additionally meant a discount within the variety of folks donating blood.
“One of the vital promising therapies that may assist somebody who’s severely threatened by COVID-19 is the method of extracting antibodies from [recovered patients’] blood plasma,” he says. “The FDA’s ban prevents males who’ve intercourse with males from donating plasma as nicely.”
Cianciotto takes difficulty with the FDA’s framing of its new, three-month deferral interval as in some way revolutionary or groundbreaking.
“The FDA, in asserting its three-month ban, spoke as if there was new science that led them to undertake this short-term coverage, when in reality, England has been doing it since 2017,” he says. “In 2001, Italy eliminated its ban solely and moved to a risk-based screening instrument. And the analysis that has been executed in Italy has proven no enhance in bloodborne illness transmissions throughout that point.”
One other one that finds the FDA’s present deferral interval ludicrous is Peter Adams, of Fairfax, Virginia. A 32-year-old homosexual man, Adams notes that he has all the time been prepared to assist out, and was upset that he was unable to reply to the Surgeon Common’s name for millennials and members of Technology Z to donate blood to deal with the pending shortages.
“I felt I used to be lacking out on a name to motion that I believe is vital,” he says.
He notes that his sexual orientation doesn’t forestall him from being an organ donor. Moreover, homosexual and bisexual males have been allowed to donate bone marrow and different tissue for just a few years, after restrictions prohibiting had been relaxed in late 2015 following steering from the FDA.
“If you happen to have a look at my driver’s license, it says I’m an organ donor, as a result of, after I die, I would like to have the ability to save as many individuals as attainable with my organs, in the event that they’re wholesome,” says Adams.
Adams, who final donated blood as a 17-year-old, was unimpressed by the FDA’s current choice, and desires the regulatory company had made bolder strikes.
“That’s nothing,” he says. “If you happen to needed to make an actual change, you’d say to homosexual males, ‘We’re going to take your blood.’ What actually grinds my gears is that this all stems from the AIDS epidemic. AIDS just isn’t a homosexual illness, anybody can have AIDS. On high of that, in the event you do donate blood, no matter the place the blood got here from, guess what they’re going to do? They’re going to check it.
“My older brother is homosexual and has been married to his husband for a number of years,” says Adams. “And also you’re telling me that they should abstain from intercourse for 3 months simply to donate blood? You’ve obtained to be kidding me. I wish to assist everybody else as a lot as they need my blood. However you’re successfully telling me it’s unhealthy blood.”
After a second of reflection, he concedes that even “child steps” like lowering the deferral interval are a type of slow-moving progress.
“Any step ahead is a step in the precise course,” he says. “I solely want it had been so much greater.”
For extra info on the FDA’s blood donation tips, go to fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics.
As a free LGBTQ publication, Metro Weekly depends on promoting in an effort to carry you distinctive, prime quality journalism, each on-line and in our weekly version. The continued coronavirus pandemic has pressured lots of our unimaginable advertisers to briefly shut their doorways to guard employees and prospects, and so we’re asking you, our readers, to assist assist Metro Weekly throughout this attempting interval. We admire something you are able to do, and please preserve studying us on the web site and our new Digital Version, launched each Thursday and obtainable for on-line studying or obtain.
— to www.metroweekly.com
